WFB: I
was once a kid. A happy kid, I believe. With two grandparents who loved me and
three siblings I was not so sure about. My elder brother, five years older, and
my sister, four years older, were strangers to me. My younger brother and I
were friends, except when punching each other in fistfights... I was a kid in
grammar school, then a teenager in Junior and Senior High School. What did I
learn in these schools? I learned how to take tests and how to lie and cheat,
if necessary to get ahead. My High School football coach -- I was a jock -- got
me into the University of Massachusetts where I went into some kind of
culture shock before dropping-out. Three more college joints followed. At one I
began trying to write a poem. I was nineteen at the time, and clueless. What
was poetry? What made certain words, arranged in a certain way, poetry? I
thought I had to crack a code to understand it. Like deciphering the Rosetta
Stone. Much trial and error ensued. Progress painfully slow. By age
twenty-five, and newly graduated college (Goddard College) I had written what I
considered -- and a few others considered -- a poem. Enough of them, in fact,
for a chapbook. Yhay. I put the poems aside and went to work. Years melted
together and disappeared like water over a dam. Poetry got lost somewhat in the
shuffle. Whenever I did write -- and not very often -- I worked at prose: short
stories, essays, book reviews, some of which were published. Mostly though I
just worked. As in working at a job. A job job. Cook, clerk, bartender,
laborer, security guard, moving man, janitor, gas station attendant,
machinist... A lot of lousy stinkin' jobs. Some less lousy and stinkin', others
more so... I also worked at getting high through drinking and drugging (no, not
through better living). In my early thirties I was court-ordered into Detox and
Rehab. None of this "work," I know, has anything to do with writing
poetry, but these experiences became, for me, fodder for poetry when I did,
finally -- in my mid-fifties -- return to writing verse. I am now age
sixty-four. In the past seven years I have published five poetry collections
and two chapbooks. If the creek don't rise I will have another collection out
next year. When I do write -- which is often, usually daily -- I work at poetry
and only occasionally at prose. I realize I have glommed-over huge stretches of
time in this autobiographical "sketch." I cannot remember some
things; other things I do not want to remember... Forgive me for going on and
on about myself. I hate talking about myself, but see I have done plenty
of it... I will quit here.
DV:
As you say, writing poetry is not an easy task (though it beats moving
furniture!). So what drives you to do it?
WFB:
I am not driven to it. What I am driven to is success -- of any kind, however
measured. It is success that helps me feel better about life in general. The
success, however limited, I have had with poetry, publishing and writing, is
what moves me to continue. Had I had similar "success" as a prose
writer, I suppose I would now be as involved in that genre, and in as exclusive
a manner, as I currently am in poetry. (Or would I? I suck at self-analysis.)
In the early years I wrote with no or little success at publishing, but I did
continue (though I went months, years even, doing little or no writing). So,
maybe I am driven. I dunno (is there a doctor in the house?). Maybe the
"success" of those early years was simply in self-expression, the act
of... Nah, I do not buy that. (I am now walking out of this cul de sac I have
written myself into... So long). I disagree with the implication that furniture
moving is harder than writing poetry. No work I have done is harder than
writing good poetry. To get a poem "right" is oftentimes a tortuous
process for me. The writing itself is sometimes easy; what comes afterward is
difficult. I am not talking about doing numerous drafts (after half-a-dozen, if
the thing still does not work, I shit-can it). I am talking about discovering
or uncovering what the poem is about -- sort of unmasking it, and bringing it
to existence, from "piece of writing" to poem. I mean, what I had in
mind to write is never the same as what I have written. Thought and language
are like oil and water: they do not naturally mix... There is also the
mechanics of the work: tightening screws, nuts, bolts; pruning, clipping,
back-filling... All the labor to get the piece "right," which, to me,
means creating a rhythm, a flow -- through the use of language, and form (line
breaks, grammatical correctness) -- essential to the narrative poem.
DV:
Though never a professional mover, I've carried enough sofas and refrigerators
up and down stairs to give me a pretty good idea of what it's like.
Fortunately, though I've done hard labor and didn't like it, I mostly managed
to make a living doing "soft" work (mainly teaching), which of course
has its own challenges too. But I infinitely preferred those challenges to the
painful physical ones. Writing poetry right, as you say, is also difficult, but
it's a different kind of hardness. It's a lot of reaching blind into unknown
areas, with ear AND mind and eventually eye too, trying to make sense of
things, finding a "suitable" expression, revising, proofreading, and,
in many cases, giving up in frustration after the creative intent is spent. But
at other times, it just falls into place, almost perfect. Ah! But those are the
rare moments. These days, when you're not playing Poet, what are you doing
to feed yourself? How do you manage to work fulltime and also write with
the energy and passion necessary to produce good work?
WFB:
Good question. I never made much money. Because of so often quitting jobs to go
and do my own thing. The chief reason I worked in construction was so I could
get laid-off in Winter, collect unenjoyment checks for however many months the
lay-off lasted, and devote myself to my art. Have never been able to do much
more than work, eat, and sleep while doing manual labor or some other
repetitive-based mind-numbing occupation (factory-worker, inventory-counter,
machinist). The question, for me, while working these gigs, always being: how
to keep my mind functioning? And the answer: reading. Steal time from the job,
if possible, to read (why I worked lonely security guard gigs). Read during
whatever weekends I had to myself. Read to stay alive, mentally; not become an
automaton incapable of creative thinking or even thinking sequentially. A real
desperate struggle some of the time... I see that I have strayed from the
question (if I was ever on it). I will try and return... During years I made
only a pittance I relied on the forbearance of others for sustenance. Those
others, of course -- even my saintly grandmother -- did not remain eternally
forbearing but rebelled, eventually, at being used. My mooching I justified.
Since I was going to be an artist, and hence, important to the world -- where
did I get that notion? -- those I sponged-off should be glad, not mad, that I
choose them, and not some other, to use as schmuck! Ha! (Henry Miller run
amuck!) Artist-Schmartist. I went to work as staff in a mental hell crisis
center (I mean "health" not hell). Then I became an LNA in a nursing
home -- a hard, sometimes brutal, job. Then I became, and presently work at,
LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), a job which has propelled me toward
middle-class stability and allowed me finally to follow Gustave Flaubert's
advice to artists: "live like a bourgeois." Outside of the nights I
return from work feeling like a used dish rag, and that final day of my work
week (moving like a zombie), I am able to write, at least take a stab at it,
regularly.
DV:
I know what you mean. The best job I ever had (except for being a lifeguard,
for very different reasons) was being night keeper of a toolroom. I would be
real busy the first hour on the job, and the last fifteen minutes, but the rest
of the time I was rarely bothered and could read or write whatever I
wanted. Do you often write about your work experiences, or are you mostly
inspired by other things?
WFB: I have mined most of my work experiences for poems. Poems not
always about the job itself, the actual work, but about the experience of
working at those jobs. Settings in which the "I" of the poem -- which
is and is not "me" -- exists. A few of my poems do describe the
mechanics of the labor involved (working on an oil rig, "Roughneck,"
as hospital attendant "Transporter," as orange picker, "A Man's
Work"), other work-related pieces are about those met on the job,
co-workers and bosses, who often are the most interesting aspect, to me, of my
work experiences... My four or five poems about working as security guard
constitute almost a sub-genre of my poetry.
DV: Could you share some of your occupational poetry with us?
WFB:
Sure, I would be glad to.
Roughneck
went
to work on a rig
in
the patch
slapping
steel
outside
Wamsutter
the
Red Desert of Wyoming
I
was the "worm"
the
new guy
I
stood on a steel mesh floor
at
the foot of a 100-foot high tower
and
looked out at the snow and
antelopes
and
thought of the song "Home On the Range"
we
sang in 3rd grade
"wake
up!" the operator shouted
and
a 50-foot long pipe came at me
that
I caught
in
my gloved hands
and
walked across the floor
and
positioned the end of it
over
the "hole"
where
it was screwed into the
previous
pipe placed
and
sent down the shaft
it
was not a job to daydream
while
at
the
steel did not give a shit
for
flesh
a
pipe came fluttering
like
a knuckle ball
in
the wind
I
caught it in the crook of my arm
and
the thing dragged me
across
the floor
and
clanged against the pipe stub
sticking
out of the hole
my
little finger in between
split
open like a crushed grape
the
boss of the rig, the "pusher"
looked
at the finger
and
threw it from him
disgustedly
and
I got a ride back to town
to
the doctor
who
sewed me up
and
I was glad
that
I
still had
ten
fingers.
(from
IN DREAMS WE CHASE THE LION, 1918)
Nips
my
Uncle got me into the laborer's union
local
number whatever
and
I went to work for the pipe-fitter's
building
a dam
in
the boondocks
of
forests
and
hills
my
cousin Tommy
who
wanted to become a State Trooper,
and
me
stood
around holding onto our shovels
like
our dicks
and
shooting the shit
until
we were sick of each other;
back
at the shop
I
rifled through stacks of
Playboy
magazines
like
a sex fiend
and
in the shack
where
we ate
everyone
shut-up whenever
Joe
spoke
because
Joe was a funny bastard
who's
stories made us laugh;
lunch
was the best time of the day
besides
quitting time
when
my Uncle would stop the car at the store
and
a six-pack would be bought
and
Mike the Welder
who
rode shotgun
would
buy 3 nips
and
finish them all
plus
a beer
or
two
before
we dropped him off.
(from
A LARK UP THE NOSE OF TIME, 2017)
Moving
Man
I
worked a day laborer job
as
moving man
and
carried box after box
of
books
out
of a professor's house
and
into a truck
parked
on a tree-lined street
in
Ann Arbor, Michigan;
the
guy working with me
took
it easy
and
carried out about half of what
I
did
and
at one point I told the guy to
get
a move-on
and
he looked at me like I was
crazy
and
maybe I was
and
late in the afternoon
the
truck driver gave me some shit
for
slowing down
and
I went off on him,
a
screaming fit,
and
he blanched
and
said that he knew
what
my problem was
and
he handed me an extra ten
but
lack
of money was not
my
real problem--
the
world was.
(from
KNUCKLE SANDWICHES 2016)
DV: Very evocative, I think. The last one, in particular, reminds me of why I hated having to do that kind of work. But at least you got extra money for it! I never did. (Don't get me wrong -- I have good friends who enjoy the physicality of it and the feeling of satisfaction at finishing a task well. And some of them also write and read voraciously. But they could never be content in an office or classroom.) Do you ever do any public readings?
WFB:
No, I do not do readings as a general rule, though I did read at a bookstore
about a year ago, a bookstore that promoted me and sold my work. Did it as a
favor for the owner... I used to read publicly a lot: when I was in college and
started this poetry jazz. Enjoyed doing it too, but sort of lost the audience when
I graduated then left the area and never really found another audience... Did
not enjoy the anxiety I felt leading up to my last reading. But once there, at
the podium, hey, it was like riding a bike, something you do not forget how to
do. Maybe giving readings is something I will pursue when I have more time and
energy (when will that be?). I am not eager. Most readings are small, sometimes
shabby, affairs. Mostly other writers in the audience. Not more than one or two
who buy your book. Little or no payment. Though there is the exposure, can't
deny that, and because of that, maybe something I will be forced into to get my
stuff out there -- getting myself known to get more of my stuff out...
DV: Do you have
regular publisher?
WFB:
Yes. Bareback Press. I have published four full-length collections with them,
2013-17. My most recently published book, my 5th collection, 2018, was with
Alien Buddha Press.
DV:
How did you establish contact with them? On a (perhaps) related note, what
brought you back to being a poet after all those years?
WFB:
I submitted work to Bareback Magazine, run by Bareback Press. I was "Poet
of the Month" in one of the magazine's issues, and then Peter Jelen, who
runs the press, asked if I had a manuscript ready for publication. I said yes
(though had about half a manuscript). As I said earlier, I had strayed from
poetry into prose. Did not see a future in poetry. Then did not see a future in
prose either. And put both aside in my mid-fifties to concentrated on drawing
-- visual art -- which I had worked on and off at -- mostly off -- since
after I graduated college. Drawing all day long on my days off work; really
into it for a couple years or more until I started to slow down and then, one
day -- cannot remember the circumstances -- I started going through my boxes of
papers, reading my old efforts, finding some good in about 30 poems -- which I
started submitting, and which became the core of my first published collection.
I also, around this time, started writing again... Writing, and submitting,
with a fierce determination; much fiercer than any of my previous efforts...
And then -- and then -- (Dreiserian pause) -- I had a heart attack, or what I
thought a heart attack but was diagnosed as "arterial heart disease,"
which put me into the hospital for a triple bypass (was shooting for the
quintuple). Arterial heart disease is what killed my father (he was 33), so my
eating healthy and exercising, both of which I was sort of doing, could no
longer forestall the progression of the disease, leading to inevitable
consequences. This "event"-- during which I got to look mortality in
the face -- added some urgency to my efforts at publication and writing (and
still does, though my health is reasonably well these days)... So: I have, it
occurs to me, sort of tip-toed around your question. I think the reading of my
old work and my realization of how good some of the stuff was -- too good to
stay confined in a box, I thought; good enough to maybe be published
somewhere... I gave a sort of "one-more-shot" deal, do or die type
action with the material... I have those early publications, those editors,
that accepted and published my work, to thank for providing the impetus to
continue (later publications, later editors -- including yourself, Duane--to
also thank.).
DV: You're
welcome. But actually I thank you for writing in the first place. Without a
source the well dries up. You say you write every day. Do you look at the
process as akin to a work schedule with a prescribed routine -- start and finish
at precisely certain times, compose X number of words, have a special
"office" or workspace for the task, use specific tools, play certain
music, light an incense candle -- or is it a more relaxed, less
ritualistic affair?
WFB:
No, no set times, no office hours, nothing like that. I carry a notebook, 7X5
(so fits in the pocket), and write in it throughout the day. Later reread what
I wrote. Then rework, do more drafts (2 or 3) of pieces that show promise.
These I type up. Add the newly typed pieces to a pile on my table of previous
typed entries. Edit the pieces whenever moved to do so. Retype them. Keep
trying to make pieces work. The ones that do "work" get sent out.
Ones that do not work are added to a scrap pile (I will later rake). When all
poems in the pile have been sent or scrapped -- means I have stopped writing or
else nothing in the notebook of promise -- I know it is time to make further
efforts; maybe need to get more serious about my writing -- stop the half-ass
goofing (which fills notebooks but produces no poems) ... I fear I am making
this poetry writing sound like a big sweaty process, like lifting weights. It
isn't (though a sort of mental weight-lifting is involved); but is a matter of
conscientiousness and effort, real effort -- getting down and dirty with one's
self.
DV:
What themes/subjects seem to preoccupy your poet self, that recur most often or
that
"complete themselves" more frequently?
"complete themselves" more frequently?
WFB: For whatever reason, my childhood preoccupies me and has been
fertile ground for me in my work. The rest of my life, my life experiences, I
also use as subject/theme but am not as preoccupied by them as I am by the
childhood stuff. My "story," being distinct to me, is really all that
I have that is solely mine. The trick, in poetry, in literature, is to make my
story relevant or meaningful to others. This is not done through
autobiographical content, but through emotional content. The emotions,
feelings, are a universal language, and the heart and guts of a good poem. The
stronger the emotional expression the more powerful the poem. So: my starting
point may be my life -- sometimes the imagined life of an other (I mean,
"I" is not always I) -- but the real subject/theme is the emotion:
shame, guilt, fear, love, sadness... What have you. I do not mean to imply, in
case I have, that there is a formula for writing good poetry. Art is not
science. There are many different writers writing in many different styles.
There are mysteries too; intangibles, unknowns coming from unconscious processes
that Carl Jung only began to fathom... Jung? I see that I have somehow wandered
into aesthetic theory... Do not want to go there... Won't... Feel a slight
throbbing somewhere in the cortex of my frontal lobe...
DV: Jung (and Jacques Derrida et al) aside, do you see the writing process as being particularly therapeutic for you? Do you think that is part of the reason you returned to the art after such a long time?
WFB: Yes, the process is therapeutic for me. Unsure what the
therapy consists of though. Something satisfying about keeping track of myself
day to day through my writing (same way journaling is satisfying, I'd guess). I
find some comfort in the work; solace, consolation even; plus it is something
for me to do, a way to occupy my time... There is also that high when I make
something good, a good poem. A surge of good feeling I carry around with me all
day -- kind of like when I was a baseball player and had hit a home run. I
remember replaying the hit over and over inside my head, same thing I do with
the lines of a good poem I've written... Yeah, it is possible I returned to
writing poems through need, but, as I've said earlier, I never really stopped
writing, I just did not practice the craft with much diligence. I was indolent;
a dilettante who liked talking and thinking about art but not the work involved
in making any.
DV: Do you think you will continue to just be a lyric poet (no
belittlement intended, most great poets fit in that category), or do you
envision doing some larger project, such as an epic or a long poem cycle?
WFB:
Lyric in the sense of writing lyrically? I hope to continue being something
like that. No, no planned epics, though sometimes I group poems together in
series. In my latest book I have a series of poems that uses an American
soldier (Vietnam) as narrator. Half a dozen pieces loosely connected by the
same narrative voice. I can envision doing a long poem thematically joined.
Hope I get to it someday.
DV:
Life is long and time endless, right? By lyric poet I meant in the sense of
writing short verses that are independent of one another (basically all poets,
at least for much of their output) rather than someone like John Milton
("Paradise Lost") or Lord Byron ("Don Juan," "Childe
Harold") or Ted Hughes ("Crow") who construct long, poetic
narratives. You are sort of a special case among poets, in that you have been
writing for a long time and yet are really a new poet. How has this
simultaneous maturity/freshness affected your approach to the task?
WFB:
I see myself as a case of arrested development. Meaning, I matured slowly and
late. Stunted first by my upbringing then by my drinking, begun at age 14 or
thereabouts. At the age of 3, after my mother died, I was put into a crib in an
upstairs bedroom of my grandparents’ home. And remained there for years. My
brother, one year younger, was kept in a similar pen on the opposite side of
the room. Once each blue moon I was brought downstairs and passed hand to hand
by the relatives who, generally, made themselves scarce as hen's teeth. I was
further isolated -- in my mind anyway -- through indoctrination, by my
grandmother, to her religion which featured a cop-God and eternal damnation.
Thus kept in the dark -- in supposed innocence -- I grew up clueless and with a
view of the world which had no reality (however you define that word) to
anything existent. I remained a child, even well into High School when I first
found alcohol and began a love affair with it that lasted fifteen years --
reaching a point of saturation when I had to decide to continue with it on to
some kind of bitter end, or else quit. I was thirty-one years old, but
emotionally around 14, the age I discovered booze (discovered that booze could
change the way I felt) which stunted my emotional development (any alcohol
counselor can confirm this fact). My way of dealing with life's problems was to
escape them, via the bottle. So... I have had thirty-plus years since to
advance into some kind of maturity. The pain of that growth has been great. At
64, am I now a mature adult? Who knows. I support myself, try and meet life's
challenges instead of run from them... Does this make me adult? Possibly... But
who wants to be adult, anyway? I think some kid-tendencies are essential for
creating art. I mean, who but a kid could believe poetry important, even
essential? Yet, that gullibility and kind of magical thinking must be brought
to the act of creation to make the art meaningful, full of any life-giving
attributes... A thought that has, once again, brought me to the realm of
aesthetics. Which I have no intention of pursuing. None. I will now escape via
the door. (ps. "life is short and art is long" -- Conrad.)
DV:
That seems like a fitting segue to the end of this interview. I have enjoyed
your candor and insights, and I look forward to reading many more of your
poems. And maybe some short stories?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Join the conversation! What is your reaction to the post?